• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Animal and Poultry Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Etman, K., El-Nahrawy, M., El-Sayed, F., Ghoniem, A., Sayed, S., Farag, M. (2020). Effect of Using Biological Additives on Performance of Animal (1) Effect of Probiotic Bacteria or Enzymes Supplementation on Productive Performance of Fatting Frisain Steers. Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 11(9), 353-358. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2020.118214
K. E. I. Etman; M. M. El-Nahrawy; F. A. El-Sayed; A. H. Ghoniem; S. K. Sayed; Mona E. Farag. "Effect of Using Biological Additives on Performance of Animal (1) Effect of Probiotic Bacteria or Enzymes Supplementation on Productive Performance of Fatting Frisain Steers". Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 11, 9, 2020, 353-358. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2020.118214
Etman, K., El-Nahrawy, M., El-Sayed, F., Ghoniem, A., Sayed, S., Farag, M. (2020). 'Effect of Using Biological Additives on Performance of Animal (1) Effect of Probiotic Bacteria or Enzymes Supplementation on Productive Performance of Fatting Frisain Steers', Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 11(9), pp. 353-358. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2020.118214
Etman, K., El-Nahrawy, M., El-Sayed, F., Ghoniem, A., Sayed, S., Farag, M. Effect of Using Biological Additives on Performance of Animal (1) Effect of Probiotic Bacteria or Enzymes Supplementation on Productive Performance of Fatting Frisain Steers. Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 2020; 11(9): 353-358. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2020.118214

Effect of Using Biological Additives on Performance of Animal (1) Effect of Probiotic Bacteria or Enzymes Supplementation on Productive Performance of Fatting Frisain Steers

Article 5, Volume 11, Issue 9, September 2020, Page 353-358  XML PDF (514.53 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jappmu.2020.118214
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
K. E. I. Etman; M. M. El-Nahrawy email ; F. A. El-Sayed; A. H. Ghoniem; S. K. Sayed; Mona E. Farag
Animal Production Research Institute (APRI), Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Dokki, Giza, Egypt
Abstract
 
Eighteen male crossbred Friesian steers aged 15 months with (ILBW) of 286.91±6.01 kg were collected and divided into three similar groups (six in each). The objective was to study performance of steers using probiotic bacteria or allzyme in ration. Trail lasted about 150d. Each animal was fed individually a basal ration 65% CFM+25% CS+10% alfalfa hay on DM basis (T1,control) or 5g probiotic bacteria/h/d (T2) or 4g allzyme h/d (T3). Animals fed ration supplemented with probiotic bacteria (T2) appeared the highest significant (P<0.05) in DM, OM, CP, CF and EE digestibility. The nutritive values as TDN and DCP were (P<0.05) higher in (T2) and (T3) than control (T1). While Ruminal pH records at 0 and 3 hrs decreased significantly (P<0.05) with (T2) and (T3) compared to (T1). Also, the concentration of NH3-N decreased. However, TVFA’s concentration in rumen liquor at 0 and 3 hrs with (T2) and (T3) were higher than (T1). Probiotic bacteria or allzyme led to significant increase (P<0.05) in total protein and globulin with decreasing albumin. The DMI tended to increase with T2 and T3. Whereas, the intake of TDN and DCP increased significantly (P<0.05) in (T2 and T3) than (T1). Feed supplementations showed significant (P<0.05) enhancement in feed conversion. Economic efficiency was high for T2 and T3 compared to T1. It could be summarized that adding probiotic bacteria and allzyme to fattening steers rations led to improve digestibility coefficient, rumen fermentation activity, blood parameters and feed intake, tended to increase DWG, feed efficiency and economic efficiency.
Keywords
Probiotic bacteria; enzymes; crossbred steers; digestion; growth performance; economic efficiency
Statistics
Article View: 318
PDF Download: 530
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.