Abdelhamid, M., Maghraby, N., Mehrim, A., Soliman, A., Ali, H. (2009). EVALUATION OF SOME NON CONVENTIONAL DIETS FOR NILE TILAPIA FISH: I- CONCERNING DIETARY COMPOSITION, WATER QUALITY, GROWTH PERFORMANCE, AND NUTRIENTS UTILIZATION OF THE FISH.. Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 34(12), 10977-10990. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2009.119396
M. A Abdelhamid; Nagwa A. Maghraby; A. I. M. Mehrim; A. A. A. Soliman; H. M. Ali. "EVALUATION OF SOME NON CONVENTIONAL DIETS FOR NILE TILAPIA FISH: I- CONCERNING DIETARY COMPOSITION, WATER QUALITY, GROWTH PERFORMANCE, AND NUTRIENTS UTILIZATION OF THE FISH.". Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 34, 12, 2009, 10977-10990. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2009.119396
Abdelhamid, M., Maghraby, N., Mehrim, A., Soliman, A., Ali, H. (2009). 'EVALUATION OF SOME NON CONVENTIONAL DIETS FOR NILE TILAPIA FISH: I- CONCERNING DIETARY COMPOSITION, WATER QUALITY, GROWTH PERFORMANCE, AND NUTRIENTS UTILIZATION OF THE FISH.', Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 34(12), pp. 10977-10990. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2009.119396
Abdelhamid, M., Maghraby, N., Mehrim, A., Soliman, A., Ali, H. EVALUATION OF SOME NON CONVENTIONAL DIETS FOR NILE TILAPIA FISH: I- CONCERNING DIETARY COMPOSITION, WATER QUALITY, GROWTH PERFORMANCE, AND NUTRIENTS UTILIZATION OF THE FISH.. Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 2009; 34(12): 10977-10990. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2009.119396
EVALUATION OF SOME NON CONVENTIONAL DIETS FOR NILE TILAPIA FISH: I- CONCERNING DIETARY COMPOSITION, WATER QUALITY, GROWTH PERFORMANCE, AND NUTRIENTS UTILIZATION OF THE FISH.
1Anim. Prod. Dept, Faculty of Agriculture, Al-Mansourah University.
2Anim. Prod. Dept., National Research Center, Ministry of Scientific Research, Cairo
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate some unconventional diets on water quality, diets composition, growth performance, feed utilization and whole fish and fish muscles composition of Nile tilapia fingerlings (7-8g). Glass aquaria were used in duplicate/treatment for 16 weeks. The basal diet contained 25% crude protein. The diets were offered daily at two meals at 3% of fish body weight. The experimental diets were nearly isocaloric and isonitrogenus. The 1st diet was a control, diets No. 2 – 5 are the control diet but their fishmeal was substituted by 25, 50, 75 and 100%, respectively with duckweed meal (DW), diets No. 6 – 9 included crayfish meal (CrFi) at the same previous replacement rates, and diets No. 10 – 13 included a mixture of DW + CrFi (1:1) as a substitute for fishmeal at the same rates. The obtained results revealed that DW contained higher crude protein and ether extract percentages as well as cadmium level than CrFi. The CrFi contained more nitrogen free extract, ash, lead and silica than DW. There were significant differences among the experimental diets in their dry matter, crude protein, ether extract, crude fiber and ash contents. Diet No. 13 included the highest crude protein percentage. The increased DW substitution rate up to 75% and CrFi up to 50% led to increase the dietary crude protein. The increased CrFi level from 25 to 100% gradually decreased the ether extract % in diets No. 6 – 9. The increased dietary inclusion of DW from 25 to 100% (diets No. 2 – 5) led to increase dietary crude fiber %. Diets No. 6 – 9 contained the highest ash %, with gradual increase proportional to the increase in CrFi substitution rate. Water quality parameters measured (temperature, pH and dissolved oxygen) did not differ among treatments. There were significant differences among dietary treatments in growth performance parameters including final body weight, body weight gain, and daily body weight gain. The highest values of these criteria were realized with diets No. 11 and 6, respectively. Specific growth rates did not differ significantly, but relative growth rates significantly differed among dietary treatment groups, being the highest with diets No. 11 and 6, respectively. The dietary treatments significantly affected feed intake, feed conversion, protein intake, protein productive value, protein efficiency ratio, and energy retention. The highest feed and protein intakes were found with diet No. 6, but the lowest were recorded for diet No. 12. The best feed conversion was calculated for diet No. 11 (the best treatment in fish bodyweight gain). The best protein utilization (protein productive value and protein efficiency ratio) was calculated for diet No. 13 although the superiority of diet No. 5 in energy retention. From the foregoing results, it would be clear that the 6th diet (25% freshwater crayfish meal as a partial replacer of dietary fish meal) was significantly the best concerning fish bodyweight gain, relative growth rate, and feed and protein intakes. This was followed by the 11th diet (50% substitution with mixture (1/1) of duckweed meal and freshwater crayfish meal), which was responsible for highest final body weight, bodyweight gain, daily body weight gain, and feed conversion, which may reflect the economical diet by decreasing feed costs to produce one Kg fish bodyweight gain. This leads to recommend the partial replacement of fish meal in Nile tilapia diets with 25% crayfish meal or 50% mixture of crayfish meal plus duckweed meal (1/1). These diets were responsible for better results than control and it is to expect that they will reduce the costs of fish feeding and production for the lower prices of either duckweed meal or freshwater crayfish meal comparing with the very expensive price of fish meal.
View on SCiNiTO
Top