• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Animal and Poultry Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Habashy, W., Enab, A., El-Tahawy, W. (2021). Prediction of Body weight and other linear Body Weight Measurements of Leghorn Versus Two Egyptian Strains of Chicken. Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 12(8), 287-291. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2021.88242.1017
W. sh. Habashy; A. A. Enab; W. S. El-Tahawy. "Prediction of Body weight and other linear Body Weight Measurements of Leghorn Versus Two Egyptian Strains of Chicken". Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 12, 8, 2021, 287-291. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2021.88242.1017
Habashy, W., Enab, A., El-Tahawy, W. (2021). 'Prediction of Body weight and other linear Body Weight Measurements of Leghorn Versus Two Egyptian Strains of Chicken', Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 12(8), pp. 287-291. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2021.88242.1017
Habashy, W., Enab, A., El-Tahawy, W. Prediction of Body weight and other linear Body Weight Measurements of Leghorn Versus Two Egyptian Strains of Chicken. Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 2021; 12(8): 287-291. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2021.88242.1017

Prediction of Body weight and other linear Body Weight Measurements of Leghorn Versus Two Egyptian Strains of Chicken

Article 9, Volume 12, Issue 8, August 2021, Page 287-291  XML PDF (1.45 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jappmu.2021.88242.1017
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
W. sh. Habashy email 1; A. A. Enab2; W. S. El-Tahawy1
1Department of Animal and Poultry Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Damanhour University, Damanhour, Egypt
2Department of Poultry and Fish Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Menoufia University, Shibin El Kom, Egypt
Abstract
The aim of this study was to undertake the relationship between body weight and linear body measurement traits in three different chicks' strains, as well as to develop some regression equations to estimate body weight from linear body measurement. A total of 600 chicks (200 each from Fayomi (F), Golden Sabahia (GS) and White Leghorn (WL)) were used for this research. Result showed that males of the three strains were significantly higher body weight (bw) and other body measurements. Comparison of three strains also showed that GS bird was significantly better than F and WL birds for all traits under study. Lower correlation value was obtained between BW and back length (BL) and significant in male WL strain at 8 weeks old. At 12 weeks old, high, positive and significant values were observed between BW and circumference breast (CB) in female WL strain. A stepwise multiple regression analysis revealed that BW was best predicted using shank length (SL), keel length (KL), CB, BL for male WL, SL, CB, BL for female WL, GS and male F. Meanwhile, BW was best predicted using SL and CB for male GS. It was concluded that breed differences do exist between the strains under study and some of body measurements can be used as accurate indicators to improve body weight. Therefore, breeding programs designed for genetic improvement of body weight in the population of Leghorn, Golden Sabahia and Fayoumi chicks can use selection of different body measurements as selection criteria.
Keywords
Correlation; Fayomi; Golden Sabahia; Regression; Shank length
Statistics
Article View: 326
PDF Download: 612
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.