• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Animal and Poultry Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Shemeis,, A. (2008). RESTRICTED SELECTION INDEXES TO INCREASE MARKETING BODY WEIGHT WITH MINIMUM CHANGE IN MATURITY WEIGHT IN EGYPTIAN BARKI SHEEP. Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 33(1), 129-136. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2008.217711
A. R. Shemeis,. "RESTRICTED SELECTION INDEXES TO INCREASE MARKETING BODY WEIGHT WITH MINIMUM CHANGE IN MATURITY WEIGHT IN EGYPTIAN BARKI SHEEP". Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 33, 1, 2008, 129-136. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2008.217711
Shemeis,, A. (2008). 'RESTRICTED SELECTION INDEXES TO INCREASE MARKETING BODY WEIGHT WITH MINIMUM CHANGE IN MATURITY WEIGHT IN EGYPTIAN BARKI SHEEP', Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 33(1), pp. 129-136. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2008.217711
Shemeis,, A. RESTRICTED SELECTION INDEXES TO INCREASE MARKETING BODY WEIGHT WITH MINIMUM CHANGE IN MATURITY WEIGHT IN EGYPTIAN BARKI SHEEP. Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 2008; 33(1): 129-136. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2008.217711

RESTRICTED SELECTION INDEXES TO INCREASE MARKETING BODY WEIGHT WITH MINIMUM CHANGE IN MATURITY WEIGHT IN EGYPTIAN BARKI SHEEP

Article 6, Volume 33, Issue 1, January 2008, Page 129-136  XML PDF (508.87 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jappmu.2008.217711
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
A. R. Shemeis,
Dept. of Animal Production, Fac. of Agric., Ain Shams Univ., Shoubra Al-Kheima, 11241 Cairo, Egypt
Abstract
Age-weight data of 1150 Barki sheep (600 females and 550 males) progeny of 60 sires and 850 dams were fitted to Brody growth function to estimate body weight at maturing. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for body weights at birth (W0), weaning (W04), 8-month (W08), yearling (W12) and maturity (WM) were estimated using a multi-trait animal model including the fixed effects of sex of lamb, year of birth and age of dam and the random effects of direct genetics. The estimated parameters were used to construct seven selection indexes aiming to improve marketing body weights W08 and W12 , representing the aggregate genotype, with minimum changes in WM.
From the standpoint of accuracy, the full index (I1 = 2.69  W0 -  0.977 W04 + 0.909 W08 + 0.433 W12)had the highest correlation with the true breeding value (rTI = 0.74) followed by late selection (rTI = 0.56 to 0.62) then early selection (rTI = 0.26 to 0.33). Use of I1 should result in developing sheep with W0 (0.14 kg), W04 (0.51 kg), W08 (1.72 kg) and W12 (2.08 kg), provided an increase of 1.36 kg in WM would be accepted. If not, two restricted selection indexes were recommended viz., I(WM) and I(W0). The index I(WM) = -2.508 W0   -0.228 W04 +0.396 W08 + 0.020 W12, would reduce the expected increase to zero in WM and to essentially zero in W0, but at the cost of reducing selection accuracy excessively (rTI = 0.30) and limiting improvement in marketing weights (0.67 and 0.87 kg). The index I1(W0)  = -2.764  W0 -  0.391 W04 + 0.477 W08 + 0.342 W12, representing a good compromise, would lead to only 0.55 kg increase in WM and zero increase in W0 together with more acceptable improvement in marketing weights (1.18 and 1.48 kg).
Keywords
Barki sheep; marketing body weight; mature body weight; genetic parameters; selection indexes
Statistics
Article View: 66
PDF Download: 216
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.