• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Animal and Poultry Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Saleh,, M., Elemam, G., Refaay, M. (2008). CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL TREATMENTS OF SUGAR BEET TOPS SILAGE FOR RUMINANT FEEDING : 1- CHEMICAL COMPOSITION, SILAGE QUALITY AND NUTITIVE VALUES .. Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 33(5), 3219-3231. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2008.217990
M. R.M. Saleh,; G. I. Elemam; M. M. Refaay. "CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL TREATMENTS OF SUGAR BEET TOPS SILAGE FOR RUMINANT FEEDING : 1- CHEMICAL COMPOSITION, SILAGE QUALITY AND NUTITIVE VALUES .". Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 33, 5, 2008, 3219-3231. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2008.217990
Saleh,, M., Elemam, G., Refaay, M. (2008). 'CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL TREATMENTS OF SUGAR BEET TOPS SILAGE FOR RUMINANT FEEDING : 1- CHEMICAL COMPOSITION, SILAGE QUALITY AND NUTITIVE VALUES .', Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 33(5), pp. 3219-3231. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2008.217990
Saleh,, M., Elemam, G., Refaay, M. CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL TREATMENTS OF SUGAR BEET TOPS SILAGE FOR RUMINANT FEEDING : 1- CHEMICAL COMPOSITION, SILAGE QUALITY AND NUTITIVE VALUES .. Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 2008; 33(5): 3219-3231. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2008.217990

CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL TREATMENTS OF SUGAR BEET TOPS SILAGE FOR RUMINANT FEEDING : 1- CHEMICAL COMPOSITION, SILAGE QUALITY AND NUTITIVE VALUES .

Article 4, Volume 33, Issue 5, May 2008, Page 3219-3231  XML PDF (796.42 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jappmu.2008.217990
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
M. R.M. Saleh,; G. I. Elemam; M. M. Refaay
Animal Production Res. Institute, Agric. Research Center ,Dokki, Egypt .
Abstract
The present study was carried out to investigate the effect of chemical and  biological treatments of sugar beet tops (SBT) on oxalic acid toxicity and the nutritive value of experimental rations by Rhmany rams . Four digestition trials were  carried out using three rams in each .The animals were nearly equal in body weight 67. 2± 0.49 kg , and fed the experimental diets according to NRC (1990) . group 1 fed 50 % concentrate feed mixture ( CFM ) + 50 %  berseem hay ( BH) as a control , group 2 fed 50 %  CFM + 50 %  untreated sugar beet tops silage ( USBTS ) , group 3 fed 50 % CFM + 50 %  chemical treated sugar beet tops silage ( CSBTS) and group 4  fed 50 % CFM + 50 % biological treated sugar beet tops silage ( BSBTS)  . The obtained results of chemical analysis indicated that CSBTS had lower oxalic acid content compared with the other types of silages . The biologically treated silage was significantly ( p < 0.05) higher in DM , CP , EE and NFE contents than those of the other treatments , whereas CF and ash were lowered . On the other hand , the BSBTS was recorded lower NDF , ADF , ADL , hemicelluloses and cellulose contents . The results of amino acid of biological treated silage showed the highest values compared with the other tested treatments .The minerals content of treated or untreated SBTS indicated that the BSBTS had higher levels of  all tested minerals. The silage quality  of BSBTS had higher pH , lactic acid values and lower  total VFA΄s and NH­­3 – N concentration . The physical properties of CSBTS showed clearly good proparties than the other types of silages . Whereas Mycotoxins were absent in chemical treated silage (CSBTS) . The aflatoxin (B1) and ochratoxin (A) were increased with USBTS group . Feed intake significantly ( p < 0.05) increased with all types of silage compared with control group . The chemical analysis of  CSBTS  and BSBTS as well as  OM , CP , CF , EE and NFE  were  in the same trend  . On the other side the BSBTS  silage was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in TDN and DCP. Finally the nitrogen balance results were clearly that is nitrogen intake and excretion in faeces and urine are the best in BSBTS than other treatments
Keywords
Sugar beet tops; Biological and chemical treatment; billy growing lambs and oxalic acid
Statistics
Article View: 84
PDF Download: 291
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.