• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Animal and Poultry Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Fouad,, R., Deraz, T. (2002). JEVALUA TION OF DIFFERENT FEEDING SYSTEMS FOR GROWING BALADI LAMBS DURING SUMMER. Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 27(7), 4539-4551. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2002.255884
R. T. Fouad,; T. A. Deraz. "JEVALUA TION OF DIFFERENT FEEDING SYSTEMS FOR GROWING BALADI LAMBS DURING SUMMER". Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 27, 7, 2002, 4539-4551. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2002.255884
Fouad,, R., Deraz, T. (2002). 'JEVALUA TION OF DIFFERENT FEEDING SYSTEMS FOR GROWING BALADI LAMBS DURING SUMMER', Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 27(7), pp. 4539-4551. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2002.255884
Fouad,, R., Deraz, T. JEVALUA TION OF DIFFERENT FEEDING SYSTEMS FOR GROWING BALADI LAMBS DURING SUMMER. Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 2002; 27(7): 4539-4551. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2002.255884

JEVALUA TION OF DIFFERENT FEEDING SYSTEMS FOR GROWING BALADI LAMBS DURING SUMMER

Article 10, Volume 27, Issue 7, July 2002, Page 4539-4551  XML PDF (1.75 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jappmu.2002.255884
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
R. T. Fouad,; T. A. Deraz
Animal Production Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture, Dokki, Egypt
Abstract
Thirty Baladi lambs of average 25 :!: 0.20 Kg body weight were randomly
divided into five groups and assigned to the following feeding treatments:
1· Chopped wheat straw (ad lib) and concentrate feed mix (CFM) at 2.5% of LBW
(control group)
2- Chopped ureated WS (ad lib) and concentrate feed mix (CFM) at 2% of LBW
3- Berseem hay (ad lib) and concentrate feed mix (CFM) at 1.5% of LBW
4- Chopped ureated WS (ad lib) and concentrate feed mix (CFM) at 1.5% of LBW and
Block (ad lib)
5- Chopped ureated WS (ad lib) and concentrate feed mix (CFM) at 1.5% of LBW and
100 ml of EI-Mufeed liquidlh/d
A comparative feeding trial for 18 weeks was conducted during summer. Five
metabolism trials were carried out in order to evaluate the feeding value of the
experimental rations.
The results obtained were as follows:
1- Berseem hay ration (group 3) had better digestion coefficients, feeding value,
nitrogen balance, daily gain and feed conversion than other groups.
2- EI-Mufeed ration (group 5) recorded the lowest feed cost per Kg weight gain and
the best economic effICiency. Lambs fed urea molasses block ration (group 4) was
better in feed conversion (as Kg TON/Kg gain)
3- Results indicated that no significant differences among groups in rumen liquor
parameters (pH, TVFA's and ammonia), Block ration (group 4) resulted in higher
pH and ammonia and lower TVFA concentrations.
4- Berseem hay ration (group 3) resulted in increased plasma TP and albumin, while
EI-Mufeed ration (group 5) resulted in increased in increased plasma glucose.
It is concluded that the nutritive value of roughage can be improved by
chopping to 3cm or ureation. Premixes such as EI-Mufeed or urea molasses blocks
can be used to reduce the cost of nutrition.
Keywords
concentrates; replacement; lambs; digestibility; urea; molasses; block; supplement
Statistics
Article View: 91
PDF Download: 242
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.