• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Animal and Poultry Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Gomaa,, A., El Moghazy., G. (2014). EFFECT OF REPLACING FISH MEAL WITH MEAT AND BONE MEAL IN NILE TILAPIA (O. niloticus) DIETS. 1-NUTRITIONAL EVALUATION AND SAFETY ASSESSMENT STUDY. Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 5(6), 365-376. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2014.70515
A. H.M. Gomaa,; G. M. El Moghazy.. "EFFECT OF REPLACING FISH MEAL WITH MEAT AND BONE MEAL IN NILE TILAPIA (O. niloticus) DIETS. 1-NUTRITIONAL EVALUATION AND SAFETY ASSESSMENT STUDY". Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 5, 6, 2014, 365-376. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2014.70515
Gomaa,, A., El Moghazy., G. (2014). 'EFFECT OF REPLACING FISH MEAL WITH MEAT AND BONE MEAL IN NILE TILAPIA (O. niloticus) DIETS. 1-NUTRITIONAL EVALUATION AND SAFETY ASSESSMENT STUDY', Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 5(6), pp. 365-376. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2014.70515
Gomaa,, A., El Moghazy., G. EFFECT OF REPLACING FISH MEAL WITH MEAT AND BONE MEAL IN NILE TILAPIA (O. niloticus) DIETS. 1-NUTRITIONAL EVALUATION AND SAFETY ASSESSMENT STUDY. Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 2014; 5(6): 365-376. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2014.70515

EFFECT OF REPLACING FISH MEAL WITH MEAT AND BONE MEAL IN NILE TILAPIA (O. niloticus) DIETS. 1-NUTRITIONAL EVALUATION AND SAFETY ASSESSMENT STUDY

Article 5, Volume 5, Issue 6, June 2014, Page 365-376  XML PDF (839.08 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jappmu.2014.70515
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
A. H.M. Gomaa,; G. M. El Moghazy.
Regional Center for Food and Feed, Agricultural Research Center
Abstract
A growth trial was conducted firstly, to evaluate the effects of using meat and bone meal (MBM) instead of fish meal at rate of 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100% in diets on the growth performance and feed efficiency of Nile tilapia (Tilapia niloticous). Secondly, to assess the safety of inclusion MBM as animal protein source in fish feeds. Five iso-nitrogenous (32% crude protein) and iso-energetic (3500 Kcal estimated digestible energy) diets replacing 25, 50, 75 and 100% of fish meal by MBM were formulated. Each diet was randomly allocated to duplicate groups of fish in fiberglass tanks and each tank was stocked with 25 fingerlings (initial average body weight 1.80 ± 0.15g). Fish were hand fed the experimental diets four times per day for 60 days. For microbial safety assessment of examined fish, three samples from each group were collected at the end of the experiment in sterile bags to measure total bacterial count, total faecal coliform count, bacillus cereus, salmonella and staphylococca. There were no significant differences in terms of final body weight, average weight gain percentage and specific growth rate among fish fed the control diet and those fed diets contained meat and bone meal up to 50% replacement. There were also no significant differences in terms of feed intake, feed conversion ratio and protein efficiency ratio between fish fed the control diet and those contained 25% replacement of fish meal with meat and bone meal. The lowest performance had been recorded for the group of fish fed diet containing 100% meat and bone meal. Total Coliform Count, Faecal Coliform count, Bacillus cereus and Salmonella were not detected in all examined samples. The obtained results of Staphylococcal count showed no significant difference between all groups. The economical efficiency study demonstrated that replacing 25% of fish meal with meat and bone meal had the best net revenue 60.92 L.E. followed by the control 60.88L.E.  and 50% replacement  of fish meal 58.98 L.E.   
Although the present results showed that MBM could safely replace up to 50% of fish meal content in Nile tilapia diets without any adverse effect on Nile tilapia performance and its safety use. Yet, the 25% replacement was the most economical.  
 
Keywords
fish meal; meat and bone meal; nutrition evaluation; safety assessment
Statistics
Article View: 304
PDF Download: 671
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.