• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Animal and Poultry Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Ghoneim, M., Abo-Farw, M., Hegazy, M., Shamiah, S. (2020). Effect of Magnetic Water on Reproductive Performance of Buffalo Bulls. Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 11(12), 489-493. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2020.161168
M. M. Ghoneim; M. A. Abo-Farw; M. M. Hegazy; S. M. Shamiah. "Effect of Magnetic Water on Reproductive Performance of Buffalo Bulls". Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 11, 12, 2020, 489-493. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2020.161168
Ghoneim, M., Abo-Farw, M., Hegazy, M., Shamiah, S. (2020). 'Effect of Magnetic Water on Reproductive Performance of Buffalo Bulls', Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 11(12), pp. 489-493. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2020.161168
Ghoneim, M., Abo-Farw, M., Hegazy, M., Shamiah, S. Effect of Magnetic Water on Reproductive Performance of Buffalo Bulls. Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 2020; 11(12): 489-493. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2020.161168

Effect of Magnetic Water on Reproductive Performance of Buffalo Bulls

Article 1, Volume 11, Issue 12, December 2020, Page 489-493  XML PDF (596.84 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jappmu.2020.161168
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
M. M. Ghoneim email ; M. A. Abo-Farw; M. M. Hegazy; S. M. Shamiah
Animal Production Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Ministry of Agriculture, Dokki, Giza, Egypt
Abstract
A total of 10 stable Egyptian buffalo bulls with an average of 435.9±2.29 kg of live body weight and 18-24 months of age were used to research the effects of magnetic drinking on testicular proportions, physical semen characteristics and buffalo bull fertility. The bulls of Buffalo were classified into two related categories (5 bulls in each). Bulls in the first group were drinking natural water (NW) and acted as a monitoring group (G1). Bulls in the 2nd category had been drinking magnetic water (MW) for 60 days of pre-semen collection. During the semen collection era, ejaculate length, sperm cell concentration, sperm kinematics using a computer-assisted sperm analyzer and testicular measurements were registered. A total of 160 buffalo cows were used in a fertile survey (80 buffalo cows in each group). The findings revealed that testicular length, distance, and height, and scrotal diameter were substantially higher in MW than in NW bulls. Serum testosterone concentration was higher (P<0.05) in MW than in NW bulls (0.833 vs. 0.716 ng/ml). Most physical semen properties were higher (P<0.001) in MW than in NW bulls. The gaps in the ratios of non-progressive motility, straightness and chaos between the two classes were not important. The design rate on days 25 and 45 of post-insemination was higher (P<0.01) for buffalo co inseminate with MW semen (95.06 vs. 91.36) than for NW bulls (86.08 and 78.48 per cent respectively.
Keywords
Buffaloes; bulls; magnetic water; scrotal circumference; semen
Statistics
Article View: 228
PDF Download: 539
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.