• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Animal and Poultry Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Saleh, M. (2012). EFFECT OF CHEMICAL AND BIOCHEICAL TREATMENTS FOR SUGAR BEET VIEN SILAGE 0N : I - GROWTH PERFORMANCE OF GROWING LAMBS .. Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 3(11), 499-510. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2012.83305
M. R. M. Saleh. "EFFECT OF CHEMICAL AND BIOCHEICAL TREATMENTS FOR SUGAR BEET VIEN SILAGE 0N : I - GROWTH PERFORMANCE OF GROWING LAMBS .". Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 3, 11, 2012, 499-510. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2012.83305
Saleh, M. (2012). 'EFFECT OF CHEMICAL AND BIOCHEICAL TREATMENTS FOR SUGAR BEET VIEN SILAGE 0N : I - GROWTH PERFORMANCE OF GROWING LAMBS .', Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 3(11), pp. 499-510. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2012.83305
Saleh, M. EFFECT OF CHEMICAL AND BIOCHEICAL TREATMENTS FOR SUGAR BEET VIEN SILAGE 0N : I - GROWTH PERFORMANCE OF GROWING LAMBS .. Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 2012; 3(11): 499-510. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2012.83305

EFFECT OF CHEMICAL AND BIOCHEICAL TREATMENTS FOR SUGAR BEET VIEN SILAGE 0N : I - GROWTH PERFORMANCE OF GROWING LAMBS .

Article 4, Volume 3, Issue 11, November 2012, Page 499-510  XML PDF (457.6 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jappmu.2012.83305
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
M. R. M. Saleh
Animal Production Res. Institute, Agric. Research Center ,Dokki, Egypt
Abstract
The present study was carried out to estimate the effect of using sugar beet tops as untreated or treated silages which concerning oxalic acid as a natural toxic component, on growing lambs fed on untreated sugar beet tops silage (USBS) or treated as well as chemical sugar beet top treated silage (CSBS) or biochemical sugar beet tops silage (B-CSBS).Twenty four growing Rahmany lambs with an average body weight of 21.99 ± 0.4 kg and aged four months were used in this study . Lambs were divided into four similar groups (6 animals each) and assigned randomly to four experimental rations according to the requirement of NRC (I990) as follows , the first group fed diet received 50% concentrate feed mixture (CFM) as pellets +50% clover hay (CH) as a control , second group fed 50 % CFM (pellets) + 50 % untreated sugar beet top silage (USBS), third group fed 50 % CFM (pellets) +50 % chemical treated sugar beet top silage (CSBS) and forth group fed 50 % CFM (pellets)+50 % biochemical treated sugar beet top silage(B-CABA)  .The experiment lasted for 26 weeks at El-Serw  Animal Production Station, Animal Production Institute Agriculture Research Center. The data indicated that body weight gain (BWG) was improved with B-CSBS, CSBS and control groups the values were 26.48, 22.41, 25.34 and 27.83 (kg) for control, USBS,CSBS and   B-CSBS, respective . thus , the TDN and DCP significantly better with B-CSBS , control and CSBS. the lowest values (p<0.05) of TDN ( 61.28) and DCP (8.16) were recorded with USBS group. Moreover feed conversion based on DM was better with B-CSBS followed by control, CSBS ,lastly USBS and the values were 8.61, 9.97,8.85 and 8.32 for control, USBS,CSBS and B-CSBS respectively .The same trend was observes with daily feed intake and water consumption . Oxalic acid values of experimental rations as well as USBS, CSBS and B-CSBS intake were 9.82, 3.95 and 3.87 mg /100respectively ,whereas total oxalic acid excretion values were 6.88, 2.59 and1.05 mg / 100g / ml for USBS,CSBS and B-CSBS respectively. .The minerals as well as calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, sodium, iron, manganese , Zink and potassium were significantly (p<0.05) higher in B-CSBS and CSBS groups compared to USBS and control one ,except for the potassium intake it was lower in B-CSBS than other test groups, Sugar beet tops silage chemical or biochemical treated be used safety, successfully and economically in ration of growing lambs at 50% of nutritional requirements economic efficiency was lower with untreated sugar beet top silage (114 LE) , whereas the economic efficiency was improved with the tow groups received B-CSBS and CSBS by 180 and 208 LE respectively .                                                                                                                                               
Keywords
Growing lambs; chemical; bio-chemical treated silage; oxalic acid residual; growth performance; economic efficiency
Statistics
Article View: 140
PDF Download: 383
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.